Monday, June 27, 2011

week 16 - 50 Cent is a Fucking Dork

I’ve recently discovered that 50 Cent is planning on writing a YA Novel. And I’m actually a little upset about it. I figured I would kill two birds with one stone, since I’ve actually wanted to make fun of 50 Cent for a little while now. This may seem immature to virtually everyone reading this, but I have good reason. Follow this train of thought: Lending a hand to children’s education is in no way cause for complaint – unless your idea of education is actually going to hurt. Let’s look at 50 Cent’s accomplishments and messages thus far.
50 Cent is a fucking dork. He has consistently dealt blow after blow upon black culture with his deleterious lyrical messages. He released an album called “Get Rich or Die Trying”. Are you fucking kidding me? As if there could be a worse bit of advice to spew out into black culture. As said in the linked article above: “…rappers have a real opportunity to sway the opinions of kids”. And even more, black culture in America has primarily manifested itself in music. I would ask if 50 Cent knows that “superficial” is a pejorative term, but I actually don’t think he’s even aware of the word.
Showing kids that it is acceptable to die to be rich is vapidity by definition. And even with all ethics aside, promoting the idea of excess material wealth in America at this time, or any time after the banking collapse of 2008, is like saying “I desire to make the same mistake twice.” Material gluttony is the destruction of capitalism, and any other system which depends on cooperation. 50 Cent is obviously not the only perpetrator of this crime.
I understand the plight of the black American is very much centered on economic stability. It’s more than a symbol of status; it’s a symbol of black progress in society. And if white Americans had a history more acquainted with oppression (cultural, racial, economic, etc.), we’d certainly have more of a proclivity for getting as far away from poverty as possible – and we’d discover this proclivity through culture. After all, economic stability is a real, tangible solution to the problem of economic oppression, a matter of dollars and cents, really - whereas things like cultural, racial, and social matters have much more illusive answers that will probably follow suit.
So if the racial harmony can begin, most simply, by fixing economic disparity, where is the harm in black culture fixating on material wealth? The harm is in the fact that this fixation does not typically manifest itself in legal forms of commerce. The problem is that a lack of opportunity within black America results in high-risk ways (drug deals, theft) of material acquisition - which is ultimately encouraged by culture.
In addition, 50's lyrics are beyond consistently violent, bigoted, homophobic, and altogether crass. He has also ‘tweeted’ that if you don’t eat pussy, you should kill yourself. Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not a part of the whole idea that our reputations and careers should be linking to our social networking doings. I don't think that anyone should be scolded for breaking from politically correct standards now and then. But it is aligned with his character as is consistently revealed in his lyrics. Lyrics are thought out – they represent you. Who you are as an artist represents you as a person. There is no escaping that.
So why attack a sort of irrelevant artist and an album that came out 5 or 6 years ago? There are more relevant pop artists who I’d much rather make fun of – like Lady Gaga and Lil’ Wayne – simply for the sake of balance, deflating hubris, and taking a stab at their ridiculously overrated artistic credibility. But the axe has to come down on somebody, and the book was the final straw.
I should make the point is amidst the day’s socially insatiable thirst for unconditional respect - it may be more important than ever to denounce things that you do not approve of. Depriving something of its oxygen or focusing on the positive is sometimes not enough to make the problem go away. Especially if no one knows that it’s okay to disagree. If you think something is stupid and even more, is totally problematic, fucking say so. Opinions are safe in numbers. Be the first one to be honest about something controversial and you will invite honesty and healthy contrast into the discussion.
Speaking of disagreement I should probably add that 50 Cent’s book is to be on the subject of anti-bullying. I don’t even understand what the big deal about bullying is. It is only because of websites like Facebook that the cruelty of children is brought back to light for parents who must have forgotten about it. Kids are cruel - kids fight. Big deal. That’s how they learn how to interact and develop social grace and sensitivity. Only a few decades ago, people used to fight a lot more often – and it was not so much a cause for concern. Take a second to ask yourself – is a conflict really so bad? Don’t forget that you are the one who decides how bad it is. You should be proud to have a child that experiences conflict – that’s what gives a child backbone. Mark my words – if we keep trying to take children away from exposure to negativity we’ll have a generation of kids made of fucking gelatin – mentally and physically. It is this childish reaction to negativity from parents, which is in turn forcing us to limit basic freedoms so that we never have to face the same challenge twice. Keep it up, parents – you’re making challenge extinct. It’s too bad that our freedom to react to perceived injustice is antithetical to the very idea of freedom itself. Childhood is not supposed to be a walk in the park – it’s supposed to be hard. Fights are not a big deal. Let’s not forget; we are animals and we are very capable of fighting and killing.
I want to put these opinions out there because I think people don’t make fun of shitty artists enough. Granted – art is a far cry from the enemy – but art is educational and informative. For kids who feel detached from their K-12 education, culture and art are where they learn. But when we have entire demographics being spoon fed a homogenized slop of purely formulaic, totally obvious art, with vacuous, uninspired and trite messages, it seems like a good place to begin to say; “hey, everyone - this sucks.” Now this is most likely simple stuff for anyone who is, in reality, reading this is. But there are plenty of hypothetical people that I imagine (haha) realizing for the first time “wait a minute, it’s okay to think celebrities are wrong?” Yup. It’s also good to know that in today’s culture of infinite access, immediacy, and banality of pop culture - celebrities are probably wrong. That’s probably why they’re celebrities.
And finally, 50 Cent is writing a bullshit book. I don’t care if he may or may not be more mature. I don’t even want to imagine the kind of advice 50 Cent thinks is illuminating if he made it this far without understanding the most basic lessons I learned in high school. There are plenty of other great YA novels out there. Please, politely dissuade people from buying 50 Cent's book. He doesn’t need your money, and nobody needs his bullshit life lessons.

5 comments:

  1. Like the art but maybe I'm wrong to think that there some holes in your argument. Don't know about you but I'm not familiar enough with his lyrics / albums to criticize them and generalize them as a whole. I can't imagine all of his stuff being mono tone-mono agenda, maybe because I'm somewhat naively optimistic about (mankind &) why he is popular or the fact that from my understanding 'get rich or die trying' is actually about overcoming and learning from your mistakes. So if anything it might be that his lyrics and tweets are non congruent with his movie and book projects, which is even more annoying and I can see the dorkness.

    Side note: Could 'rich' mean wealthy in happiness or economic stability, not just literally the riches person on the block? Not knowing his work more I can only throw out all these opposing view points as a possible context.

    Now with your other argument, bullying. Isn't homophobia and sexism a form of bullying? So is it still good to have these conflicts? Isn't that what you're beef is against 50? If there is no antagonists then there is no conflict. But this is really off the topic I meant to voice secondary in this comment. Yes, bullying is good for some kids and makes them stronger but that is one side of the coin. The other fueled the deaths at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Rutgers, and nameless others. I think it's just one of those issues that can't conform to a guideline, or is too broad of a spectrum dependent upon case by case, kid by kid disputes. Maybe I'm too tired right now to see middle ground, or something I'm missing but it is definitely a deeper conversation then you propose.

    Side note: I agree we will become gelatin if there is no challenges in life but I am hopeful again there is/will be a middle ground we can cling to/build upon.

    Last note: Celebrities are just other normal dysfunctional people. Up for interpretation among importance. I attempt to ignore what/who is unimportant in the same way I do everyone.

    I really like the background a lot. Nice first famous person piece though. (Those unsymmetrical biceps (or whatever) are killing me though.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. HAHA god damnit Fama I shoulda just DELETED your comment while it AWAITED IN MODERATION. You JERK. You're gonna make everyone see that I dont know what i'm talking about.

    I dont really think homophobia and sexism are forms of bullying, per se, because they are bigger than bullying. They occur outside of bullying. When I hear "bully" or "bullying" I immediately think of a school yard and a fat kid and a skinny kid. But obviously the definition is wider than that.

    I mean, it is a good point that bullying can be a slippery slope for suicides, and unhealthy social trauma, possibly murder, and other extremely bad things, but these cases are rare. Should we disturb the way of the world and infringe on the freedom of young people (who NEED to discover how to interact) so that some rare but extremely negative instances can be avoided?

    This isn't a utopia, and we shouldn't try to make it one. It's never gonna be on Earth as it is in Heaven. There's no such thing as an ideal existence. We have to except that some things we just can't try to control - lest we become a totalitarian state. What are we supposed to do, tell kids how to behave and think? That's WAY worse that letting a few innocent people fall by the wayside. This is the price you pay for freedom and I think it's a fucking bargain.

    Things like sexism and homophobia I see much different causes for. These are things we CAN work out. The difference is that "bullying" is about no specific demographic, and racism and sexism are about demographics, which categorizes them under "discrimination" - and discrimination can be reasoned with. But saying you want to stop bullying is like saying you want to stop unintelligence. There is no defining quality or race or demographic of an unintelligent person. It might be worth it worth to say, though, that if there WAS a definite way to identify unintelligent people, would we discriminate against them? Absolutely, we would. I'm not advocating that viewpoint - just saying that that IS what would happen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree it is a bargain and I don't want a definite utopia. But we ARE suppose to tell kids how to behave and think, 'we' being parents and 'telling' by teaching them right from wrong. After that it is up to the kids to make there own choices and deal/learn from the consequences. It's the best we can do, unfortunately not all parents do/can.

    BTW: Another demographic under the act of bullying which bares mentioning is people with disabilities, this too needs to be separated.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Right, parents are supposed to tell their kids how to behave. What to THINK i'm not so sure about. It's hard to define the difference though. Kids should definitely be ordered to behave however their parent say, and should not be making choices for themselves at an early enough age. I think letting your kid do the deciding at too early an age is definitely a problem. I guess it's a matter of applying sense to what choices you allow them.

    This is ultimately up to the parent, though. The problem is that adults, in often cases, require parenting as much as children. Unfortunately we resent being parented upon adulthood. Adults still need education. And if the anti-bullying thing is a movement for PARENTS as well as children then maybe I agree with that. I don't oppose any kind of attempt at education, i just hope that it doesn't result in LEGAL action. Because once the government has a say in the way we think - that would be totalitarianism.

    Right, the disabled are bullied. Another demographic that bullying acts on - but still exists outside of bullying. Again, bullying is something that is essential to the world of childhood. You can't take the factor of immaturity out of the process of gaining maturity, ya know? You just have to take the violent effects of immaturity with the process of dealing with it.

    Also, things like suicides and deaths are not simply the result of bullying. Malcolm Gladwell, in The Tipping Point, discusses social epidemics in the form of suicides and murders. He says basically that suicides, because of their EXTREME social impact, can catch on rather easily as social epidemics.

    He cites that during the 1960's, in that South Pacific islands of Micronesia, a suicide epidemic raged for about 20 years. It all started when a 17 year old boy named Sima killed himself because his father kicked him out of the house for not successfully harvesting breadfruit. Until that point, suicide on the island had been unknown. It eventually rose to a ratio of 16 in 10,000 - which means it was pretty commonplace. It was, after its initial occurrence; triggered by super mild occurrences, like break-ups, fights, etc.. So what this says is that the discovery of suicide led to mimicry by young people - simply as a result of the knowledge of suicide as a possibility.

    Gladwell relates this to the Columbine incident; noting that after this initial event, many copycats followed suit. The idea of murdering your schoolmates caught on and became a mild epidemic. There are a few instances where major bullets where dodges, and kids around the country where found stocking up on guns, explosives, and ammunition.

    It's sort of like how only today do people see little green men from outer space - simply as a result of the image that hollywood has left of aliens in our heads. If you were born in the 1600's, you wouldn't claim to have "seen" big-headed green aliens, you would claim to have "seen" demons and angels. All the is required is that the inkling be planted in our subconscious for us to manifest these ideas.

    Many events require only an initial "mutant" individual to exploit some unseen possibility, for the event to take off as an epidemic.

    Also - "Get Rich or Die Trying" is TOTALLY literal! Don't even pretend it's not!

    ReplyDelete
  5. *The More You Know......
    I agree with you there on all of it. Just thought there needed to be more conversation on the initial point/post.

    Haha, yeah I was thinking you're probably right, he is an entrepreneur, doesn't he own that vitamin water or something?

    ReplyDelete